[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ndiswrapper and kernel source



See response in-line.

Also:
        Ruins the discussion
        Lists it really
        Top Post in the Debian
        Please try not to

On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 16:14 -0800, Manu wrote:
> I have it installed but it gives me some warnings that
> the kernel source are not configured...
> 
> Also now I tried again and I have a different error:
> 
> 
> # build and install the module
> /usr/bin/make KPKG_EXTRAV_ARG= KSRC=/usr/src/linux \
> KVER=2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 \
> INST_DIR=debian/ndiswrapper-modules-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8/lib/modules/2.6.10-9-amd64-k8/misc/
> install
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper'
> /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux
> SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper \
>         NDISWRAPPER_VERSION=1.0rc2 \
> 	        EXTRA_VERSION= modules
> 		make[2]: Entering directory
> `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8'
> 		  CC [M]  /usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper/hal.o
> 		  cc1: error: code model `kernel' not supported in
> the 32 bit mode
> 		  make[3]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper/hal.o]
> Error 1
> 		  make[2]: ***
> [_module_/usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper] Error 2
> 		  make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8'
> 		  make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> 		  make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper'
> 		  make: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> This is the last piece I need to configure on my
> laptop but it is really frustrating!

Maybe Blade (Eduard Bloch) can comment on this. the 64bit stuff is still
quite fuzzy for me.


> > 
> > Install this package:  module-assistant
> > 
> > Once installed  (use: apt-get install
> > module-assistant)
> > 
> > Start it and follow directions. All should be well.
> > -- 
> > greg, greg@gregfolkert.net
> > 
> > The technology that is
> > Stronger, better, faster:  Linux
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
-- 
greg, greg@gregfolkert.net

The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster:  Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: