On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 18:32 -0800, Alvin Oga wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 00:36 -0800, Alvin Oga wrote: > > > hi ya > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > > > > > > > take ext3. ext3 is reliable, and doesn't hickup when there is a badblock > > > > > > sure it does ... ext2 is underneath ext3... so its painful > > > > That's a bit of an ambiguous statement. > > > > ext3 uses the ext2 disk structures, but it is my understanding > > that the ext3 *code* has nothing at all to do with ext2. > > than please explain why and how you can convert from ext2 to ext3 > just by "undoing" the journaling to run in ext2 instead of ext3 > and also convert from ext2 to ext3 .. Why is it amazing to you that two separate apps can understand the same data structures? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "A hundred names on the ballot are better than one, because it means that we are free." FADILA SALEH, an Iraqi voter, 2005-01-30
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part