[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nvu on sarge?



On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:45:24 -0800, Randall J. Parr
<RParr@temporalarts.com> wrote:
> Joan Tur wrote:
> 
> >Es Dijous 03 Febrer 2005 23:47, en Randall J. Parr va escriure:
> >| What is the trick, if any, to getting Nvu running on sarge?
> >|
> >| I downloaded and unpacked nvu-0.80-pc-linux2.4.23-gnu.tar.bz2.tar
> >|
> >| When I try to run it I get the following error:
> >|
> >| $ cd nvu-0.80
> >| $ nvu
> >| ./nvu-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3:
> >|     cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> >|
> >| Yet libstdc++ appears to be installed
> >|
> >| $ dpkg -l |grep libstdc++
> >| ii  libstdc++5     3.3.5-5        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
> >| ii  libstdc++5-3.3 3.3.5-5        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
> >| (development
> >| ii  libstdc++6     3.4.3-6        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
> >|
> >| Any idea what's missing here?
> >apt-file can help you here:
> >
> >-----
> >root@quinipt:/home/quini# apt-file search libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> >libstdc++2.10-dbg: usr/lib/debug/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> >libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
> >-----
> >
> >You should then install libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2... good luck  ;)
> >
> >
> >
> 
> The pkg libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 appears to be pkg related to gcc 2.95.
> I have gcc 3.3 installed.
> 
> Is libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 an old pkg or a compatibility pkg?
> 
> Is it save to install it?
> 
> Is there a better way to provide the requisite backwards compatibility?

I don't suppose this is recommended practice, but I've had success
simply symlinking the name of the "missing" library to the one I have
installed.  This usually seems to work if the installed version is
later than the missing version; it's probably a lot more risky the
other way around.  And, if it doesn't work, no harm's done.

(I haven't done this specifically with nvu, but did do it recently
with the C++ libraries and an installer, and it worked fine.)

Patrick



Reply to: