[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: xwindows ati rage 128 pro
To
: Adam Lafayette <
atomlbomb@yahoo.com
>
Cc
:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: xwindows ati rage 128 pro
From
: Adam Porter <
adam@alphapapa.net
>
Date
: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:36:06 -0600
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
41FF1546.9000306@alphapapa.net
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
20050201050352.61072.qmail@web54106.mail.yahoo.com
>
References
: <
[🔎]
20050201050352.61072.qmail@web54106.mail.yahoo.com
>
You might try Knoppix and see how well it runs. That could give you an
idea of what to do.
Reply to:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Adam Porter (on-list)
Adam Porter (off-list)
References
:
xwindows ati rage 128 pro
From:
Adam Lafayette <atomlbomb@yahoo.com>
Prev by Date:
"Package is in a very bad inconsistent state" and j2sdk1.4
Next by Date:
Re: why can't i compile a 2.6.10 kernel?
Previous by thread:
xwindows ati rage 128 pro
Next by thread:
"Package is in a very bad inconsistent state" and j2sdk1.4
Index(es):
Date
Thread