[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cd burning with kernel 2.6.10



Garrett McLean(gpm@berkeley.edu) is reported to have said:
> Hi everyone. I have a 'CyberDrv' 'CW058D CD-R/RW  ' '110D' Removable 
> CD-ROM. I have had mixed success using the ide-cd driver alone to burn 
> cds with this drive. Sometimes it works without a hitch, and, sometimes 
> it causes cdrecord.mmap to hang (can't ctrl-c out of it, can't kill 
> it...only way to kill it is to reboot). With ide-scsi (in 2.4.27) there 
> is absolutely no problem whatsoever. I'd like to start using 2.6 
> exclusively though, so I thought maybe yous guys could help me decipher 
> my error messages and find a happy ending:
> 
> This is what cdrecord does:
> 
> ludwig:/home/carrett/music/cd# cdrecord dev=/dev/hdc -eject -v image.iso

Instead of "cdrecord dev=/dev/hdc" you might try the folowing:

cdrecord dev=ATA -scanbus  (which returns this here)
scsibus1:
  1,0,0   100) '_NEC    ' 'DVD_RW ND-3500AG' '2.16' Removable CD-ROM

So I use cdrecord dev=ATA:1,0,0 

This will  enable DMA on the drive which might help with these error
messages. 

> And these are the kinds of messages that pop up in /var/log/messages:
> 
> Jan 17 14:42:19 ludwig kernel: hdc: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> Jan 17 14:42:19 ludwig kernel: hdc: status timeout: 
> error=0xd0LastFailedSense 0x0d
> Jan 17 14:42:19 ludwig kernel: hdc: DMA disabled
> Jan 17 14:42:49 ludwig kernel: hdc: ATAPI reset timed-out, status=0x80
> Jan 17 14:42:49 ludwig kernel: hdd: DMA disabled
> Jan 17 14:42:49 ludwig kernel: ide1: reset: success
> Jan 17 14:43:49 ludwig kernel: hdc: lost interrupt
> Jan 17 14:43:49 ludwig kernel: hdc: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> Jan 17 14:43:49 ludwig kernel: hdc: status timeout: 
> error=0xd0LastFailedSense 0x0d
> Jan 17 14:43:49 ludwig kernel: hdc: ATAPI reset complete
>
> The box is running sid on 2.6.10. Thanks in advance for any help!

I am also running 2.6.10.  

:-) HTH, YMMV, HAND :-)

Wayne
-- 
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct
one.
_______________________________________________________



Reply to: