[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

sendmail problem, sending from console



Hi,

I want to be able to send mail from the console, i tried this and
thats the result,

any one recognizing the problem ?


slg:/home/zazu# mail kim.onnel@gmail.com
Subject: hi
testing
.
Cc:
slg:/home/zazu# Can't send mail: sendmail process failed with error code 67

Checking sendmail running:

root      5630  0.0  2.3  7244 2888 ?        Ss   17:37   0:00
sendmail: MTA: accepting connections
root      5681  0.0  1.7 15180 2224 ?        Ss   17:42   0:00 sshd:
zazu [priv] v]
zazu      5684  0.0  1.8 15352 2304 ?        S    17:42   0:00 sshd:
zazu@pts/11 11
zazu      5685  0.0  1.1  2624 1476 pts/11   Ss   17:42   0:00 -bash
USER=zazu LOGNAME=zazu HOME=/home/zazu PATH=/usr/local/bi
root      5701  0.0  1.2  2676 1552 pts/11   S    17:42   0:00 bash
TERM=xterm SHELL=/bin/bash SSH_CLIENT=62.240.111.115 48917
root      5723 98.0  1.7  5708 2244 ?        Rs   17:45  57:38
/home/zazu/zazu2/zazu2/sbin/zazu -p 2056 -c /home/zazu/zazu2/za
root      5977  0.0  2.6  7700 3368 ?        S    18:39   0:00
sendmail: MTA: server localhost [127.0.0.1] cmd read  read
root      5978  0.0  2.6  7700 3368 ?        S    18:39   0:00
sendmail: MTA: server localhost [127.0.0.1] cmd read  read
root      5997  0.0  2.6  7700 3368 ?        S    18:40   0:00
sendmail: MTA: server localhost [127.0.0.1] cmd read  read
root      5998  0.0  2.6  7700 3368 ?        S    18:40   0:00
sendmail: MTA: server localhost [127.0.0.1] cmd read  read
root      6002  0.0  1.4  6372 1848 pts/11   S    18:43   0:00
send-mail -i -- kim.onnel@gmail.com SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm
root      6011  0.0  0.6  2512  840 pts/11   R+   18:43   0:00 ps auxe
SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm SSH_


slg:/home/zazu# mailq
MSP Queue status...
/var/spool/mqueue-client is empty
                Total requests: 0
MTA Queue status...
/var/spool/mqueue is empty
                Total requests: 0

but this took forever by the way,

what else can i look at,

Regards



Reply to: