Re: virtual interfaces
Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
>> Here's the problem - eth0 and eth0:0 are identical, so you have defined
>> the interface twice.
>
> really? I can bind eth0 and eth0:0 to different IPs on my 2.4 box no
> problem.
I just tested this on my system (2.6) and it is the same here.
> this website:
>
> http://pachome1.pacific.net.sg/~harish/linuxipalias.html
>
> says that eth0:0 and eth0:1 are different from eth0:
It was my understanding that eth0 and eth0:0 were equivalent. It appears I
was mistaken. Thank you for pointing this out.
Adam
Reply to: