If ATI and nVidia don't support their own products, who does?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roberto Sanchez <rcsanchez97@yahoo.es> writes:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> <#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
>> Roberto Sanchez <rcsanchez97@yahoo.es> writes:
>>
>>>>What I would like to do is get an nVidia card.
>> Mistake du jour! You'll only spend more on the nVidia for even
>> crappier drivers. Just get a newer Radeon if you want graphics
>> performance. I believe there's actually working open drivers for the
>> ATI adapters.
>
> Problem is that the newer Radeon cards have even worse support
> in the open source drivers. It is really aggravating since
> I want a card that will allow me to play my games in Linux.
> The two that I play now are Neverwinter Nights and America's
> Army. I would probably get more in the future, but not if I
> can't my video card to perform better.
OK, who manufactures a video card who actually supports properly what
they make, then? Cause it sure isn't nVidia, and it sounds like it's
not ATI?
> Anyway, how bad are the nVidia drivers? The only experience
> I have had with them (one high-end workstation in the Linux
> lab I formerly admined) was fairly positive.
*Bad* though the situation is improving slowly. What really needs to
happen is nVidia and ATI to get their heads out of their asses and GPL
their drivers already. I mean, what is it they like about
recto-cranial inversion? Is it the warmth? The smell? The fit?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBXj9yUzgNqloQMwcRAp4uAKCaKXs2J4x+upOHUNPsyU2MEykEAgCeJ5+Y
dkUh/KSK/ddkBo5b57IRXkI=
=6e0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: