Re: Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?

To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:15:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1102716933.637216.27384.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE>
Reply-to: ams@kemisten.nu
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87hdmu8784.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from Dan Jacobson on Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:10:19 +0800)
References: <[🔎] 87is7czmlf.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 1102549306.636740.22843.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <[🔎] 87hdmu8784.fsf@jidanni.org>

   A> nohup sh -c "(sleep 100h; move-my-toes)" &

   Yeah, never rebooted where you live.

Does at survive a reboot?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?
  - From: "Daniel B." <REMOVEdanielTHIS@fgm.com>

References:
- Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?
  - From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Re: Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?
  - From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
- Re: Debian's at(1) is so bad, what does GNU use?
  - From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>