Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??

To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
From: Jon Dowland <dowland@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:51:24 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] efb0666804113008516d7b38f3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Jon Dowland <dowland@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] coi60d$58c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20041130094729.GB1170@ifi> <[🔎] coi60d$58c$1@sea.gmane.org>

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:45 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote:

> In general I would run WITH the patches, since powers greater than I
> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
> greater than I ;-)

I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era,
I disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that
was put in the debian kernel.

-- 
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
  - From: Ken Bloom <kabloom@ucdavis.edu>

References:
- debian and linus kernel, the difference??
  - From: Mauro Darida <robert@nonsense.com>
- Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
  - From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Powerbook produces a lot more heat after kernel upgrade
Next by Date: Re: iTunes Replacement for Linux
Previous by thread: Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
Next by thread: Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread