Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid
- To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid
- From: Jon Dowland <dowland@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:28:05 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] efb06668041101052852e0d7ee@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Jon Dowland <dowland@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <slrn-0.9.7.4-13800-31761-200410311254-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>
- References: <1099121001.17753.33.camel@haggis.homelan> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1041030003317.22515B-100000@Maggie.Linux-Consulting.com> <64e01c4d04103007074a0298be@mail.gmail.com> <slrn-0.9.7.4-13800-31761-200410311254-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:55:54 +1100, Tim Connors
<tconnors+linuxdebianuser1099187651@astro.swin.edu.au> wrote:
> Wim De Smet <kromagg@gmail.com> said on Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:07:58 +0200:
> Get a proper client. That's what the References and In-reply-to
> headers are for. If your client doesn't use it, it's non compliant
> with the RFCs and broken. Oh, and most likely to break other clients
> which *are* compliant.
>
> Fscking google and Outlook with their braindead implementation of the
> standards.
Indeed - my broken google mail doesn't make it easy for me to killfile
people who wander off topic either, so please refrain from that too.
--
Jon Dowland
dowland@gmail.com
Reply to: