Re: Going to install testing: should I use sarge or woody installer?
Actually, if you installed with Woody and afterwards change sources list to
testing, everything would go mad.
So just use sarge to install if that's what finally you like to use.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thierry Michalowski" <Thierry.Michalowski@echotech.ch>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: Going to install testing: should I use sarge or woody installer?
> Hi ,
>
> I'm going to install a new machine on Debian, and I will surely follow
> testing, as I've been used to for years.
>
> Nevertheless, installing a new machine with woody today, just to upgrade
> it to testing (and I do want a 2.6 linux kernel!) looks cumbersome.
> The question is : should I nevertheless proceed with a woody
> installation CD , manually change my sources.list and apt-get
> dist-upgrade at will ?
> Or should I use the sarge-rc1 CD install ?
>
> Related question : if I use sarge-rc1 to install, will apt get
> automatically configured to follow testing ?
> Or, when sarge will become stable, would I have to take care of changing
> my apt config if there happened a requirement to stick to stable
afterwards?
>
> I realize my questions may look awkward but I simply can't wait for
> sarge to be "stable" unless it happens whithin the next 2 weeks.
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Thierry
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: