Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:02:33 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u0smi1bq.fsf@ursine.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1098444223.18808.38.camel@haggis.homelan> (Ron Johnson's message of "Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:23:43 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 87hdonyzix.fsf@ursine.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 3b5373c90410220356327e8324@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1098444223.18808.38.camel@haggis.homelan>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:

> No, because Linux doesn't see the CPU cache.  I'd bet my last 
> kopek that Paul is talking about:
>
> $ cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:      1003760 kB
> MemFree:         89652 kB
> Buffers:        138752 kB   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Cached:         326116 kB   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBecnJUzgNqloQMwcRAnoEAJ40cK4alH/EYKrI9bz/R+rWEV8r5ACggY//
LBE+NDl00OGpwie7hrqSEQQ=
=/lUK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Micheal Mukherji <michy.mighty@gmail.com>

References:
- Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Micheal Mukherji <michy.mighty@gmail.com>
- Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Next by Date: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Previous by thread: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Next by thread: Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread