Re: Which wiki?
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"S.D.A." <dallan@rogers.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:58:50AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul
> Johnson wrote:
>
>> In light of slash being a pain in the butt, and my domain being
>> stolen, I'm thinking about moving my site over to a wiki. Debian
>> has several competing wiki implementations, and I was wondering if
>> anybody uses these implementations and if so, which everyone
>> prefers.
>
> How did they manage to do that?
An ex-friend had registered it for me and we hadn't gotten around to
transferring it.
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Just wondering why a wiki? Unless you're intending for it to be
> interactive without editorial consent, then there are many other
> premade packages that are pretty good.
Well, I like the wiki format for HOWTOs and whatnot and want to
have what I create evolve over time a bit more easily than is possible
than with slash. Looking at MediaWiki (think Wikipedia), it seems I
can get a happy medium with a wiki (though not necessarily with
MediaWiki, since there is no Debian package that I could find).
> To name a couple (both can be found on freshmeat:
I'm trying to stick to what's available on p.d.o if possible, or just
apt-get-able in general.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBM3/nUzgNqloQMwcRAqplAKC0E9qOE33uLI3IWNwLmPgak4vc2ACgmwpM
RQ+bjftEWH4gZI4yEqcLSsU=
=5cPD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: