[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alternative to cdrecord?



On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 18:06, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:44:15PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
> > I've been hit with the issues between cdrecord and the 2.6.8 kernel.
> 
> "The" issues... what issues?

Haven't you heard? IIRC the kernel 2.6.8 plugged a security hole that
cdrecord used to function. Once the hole was closed, users could no
longer run cdrecord as they could in previous kernels. With the old
kernel, a user could potentially wipe a drives firmware.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: