Re: why not anaconda installer
--- Thomas Adam <thomas@edulinux.homeunix.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene
> abdelkader wrote:
> > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use
> the
> > anaconda as
> > installer. It is very easy for installation !
>
> Easy is subjective. Easy for what? How?
OK ; First look at for example when you install
Knoppix ( I mean specially for the new debian user )
The hardware is automatically found ,
the choice of the package at least the commonly used
a friendly graphical interface
( same thing with suse or redhat installer)
I would like to get something like this to install the
debian
I prefere debian for many aspects, but I think the
installation is not easy yet.
I hope that the developpers propose at least an iso
image installer ( as an indepedant installer) for
those who want to use it.
In my for example , I installed the knoppix 3.3 which
detects my hardware, the sound card, the isa-card ...,
after that I complete, the installation from
downloaded CD with the apt-get !!!???
best regards
Whom? Which
> aspect is easy?
>
> > I just tried the new version sarge, it is still
> > complicate for new user
> > !!!
>
> Granted it is not without its faults, but it isn't
> so bad that it doesn't
> work, or is unintuitive.
>
> > is there any reason ? or is there a new installer
> in
> > project
>
> Not that is based on anaconda, thankfully.
>
> -- Thomas Adam
> --
> "Frankly, Mr. Shankly, since you ask. You are a
> flatulent pain in
> the arse." -- Morrissey.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
=====
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Reply to: