Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?

To: DebianUser List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
From: Carl Fink <carl@fink.to>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:52:46 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040731145246.GA6779@nitpicking.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1091282207.6323.18.camel@duke.gregfolkert.net>
References: <[🔎] 41091075.7050503@list.idg.dk> <[🔎] 20040729200316.GA21137@nitpicking.com> <[🔎] 1091252077.433.201430589@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 1091282207.6323.18.camel@duke.gregfolkert.net>

BTW, using information from 

	http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html

section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
libraries to run under Woody (unless the program requires actual features
not available in the older libs).
--      
Carl Fink             carl@fink.to
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http://www.jabootu.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
  - From: Silvan <dmmcintyr@users.sourceforge.net>

References:
- What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
  - From: Jacob Friis Larsen <jfl@list.idg.dk>
- Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
  - From: Carl Fink <carlf@fink.to>
- Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
  - From: listcomm@ml1.net
- Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
  - From: Greg Folkert <greg@gregfolkert.net>

Prev by Date: Networking Problem
Next by Date: Re: XMMS Error
Previous by thread: Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Next by thread: Re: What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread