Re: file descriptor 0 (zero)

[Wayne Topa <brittman@capital.net>]

John Summerfield(debian@ComputerDatasafe.com.au) is reported to have said:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
> 
> >John Summerfield(debian@ComputerDatasafe.com.au) is reported to have said:
> > 
> >
> >>leela wrote:
> >>
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >John 
> >
> >Why are you doing this?
> >
> >From: John Summerfield <debian@ComputerDatasafe.com.au>
> >Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:07:31 +0800
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org   <----------?????
> >Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org   <----------?????
> >
> >Or do I have mutt screwed up??  If so why is it only showing uop on
> >your mail?
> > 
> >
> 
> It's not your dog.
> 
> What I try to remember to do is "replay-all."
> Then, because I don't like personal replies, I remove off-list 
> recipients. That often leaves the only recipient header being cc:
> 
> It may be that tbird gets confused at that point. It doesn't complain, 
> but it may generate both cc: and to: headers.
> 
> Nobody should get duplicate mail on that account, so I rate it as a 
> curio. I will watch though.
> 
Well 'yesterday' I was getting dups on 'most' of your mail.  Odd thing
is they were coming in 2-4 hours 'after' the original.  It was so
sporadic that it got me thinking I had done something here to cause it

> In this case there were no email addresses to prune and I fully expect 
> one recipient header.

yep, this mail didn't have the Cc:, or a dupe.

Thanks John

Wayne
-- 
Rich companies buy Red Hat Linux and a costly service agreement.
Smart companies install Debian Linux and just enjoy it. 
_______________________________________________________