[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anyone else suddenly got debian-user-digest messages?



>On Saturday 19 June 2004 09:49 am, HdV@DTO.TUDelft.NL wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
> >Starting yesterday I suddenly started to receive debian-user-digest
> >messages from murphy. I most surely  didn't subscribe myself to the
> >digests, so something else must have happened. Anyone else
> >experienced the same?
>>
>> Grx HdV

>I haven't.  Based on the lack of response, probably not many others have 
>either.  Smile, you're special. 

>-- 
>Best,
>Aaron Maxwell - http://redsymbol.com
>Internet Joint Ventures - http://amusene.com

I subscribe to debian digest and about a week ago I stoped receiving the list, 
this has happened a few times.  I still got my other Debian mailing lists, 
and thought it was a little weird.  Then a day ago, I all of a sudden got a 
list burp, about 87 or 100 debian digests from the missing time I did not 
receive the list.  I looked at the headers, and it seems that they were sent 
in the last day or so, but headers can only tell so much.

This has happened in the past and I wrote it off as an ISP filtering my 
messages thing.  The funny thing is I always get a high count of spam so it 
seems a litter weird that my ISP would filter a mailing list, and not the 
spam, but such is the life of a crappy cable company.  I also thought it was 
weird that it did not filter my other lists, so I have no clue as to what the 
problem is, in the past I sent emails to my ISP but it did not do any good. 
Heck I had a DNS ISP server problem that took them 8 months to fix, I had to 
use the ip address, no one local or national seemed to care.  

So if murphy is acting up it would explain my digest problem.  But I still 
received my other lists.  So I have no clue as to what the heck is going on, 
doesn't murphy serve all the mailing list's?  What makes digest so special if 
it is murphy? Is it the collecting of the messages then posting them, ie the 
digest aspect?  

rthoreau



Reply to: