Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:30:19PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
> For a minimal false positive rate I would recommend using greylisting
> first. This will delay some emails (first occurence of every
> IP/sender/recipient tripel) by 10min - 1h (depending on the sender mail
> server), but will instantly block quite a lot of spam and
> viruses/trojans. (Debian: greylistd. Also, postgrey for postfix. Don't
> use the greylist example script that comes with postfix 2.1, see the
> postgrey web site for why).
Great idea. Unfortunately the mail server I run is, as one might suspect,
on Stable, which has no postgrey package.
Why, yes, I could compile it myself, but why run Stable and then make it
less stable?
--
Carl Fink carl@fink.to
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http://www.jabootu.com
Reply to: