Re: Pros/Cons Kde vs Gnome?
CaT <cat@zip.com.au> said on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:14:37 +1000:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:50:43PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > s. keeling wrote:
> > > I gave up on both of those; they're equally uncontrollable, and far
> > > too fat to leave any room for actual applications to run. ymmv.
> >
> > Could've fooled me.
> >
> > KDE + Squid + Addzapper + other stuff...
> >
> > {grey@teleute:~} free
> > total used free shared buffers cached
> > Mem: 775556 767612 7944 0 131368 392300
> > -/+ buffers/cache: 243944 531612
> > Swap: 655344 26600 628744
> >
> > 531Mb's not enough? Hmph.
Gee, the biggest workstation I have access to only has 1GB ram. Aren't
you lucky?
> It's more of a case of 'Isn't 240Mb (or 200 cos of squid) a bit much for
> a pretty desktop?' ;)
Especially if you only have 256MB ram (think: anything more than 1 year
old - ie, what the majority of us own).
The day some idiot breaks X irreperably for Fvwm users in favour of
some fancy new shiny crap, is the day I leave Linux.
--
TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/
cat /kat/ n. A furry keyboard cover
Reply to: