Re: browsers: was: Console only box?
Parts of the site I could navigate and parts I couldn't, but the same
thing happens to me with many sites with links. I said that lynx works for
me for a lot of things, that it isn't "useless" to me. I search, find,
download and shop every day with lynx and, though I certainly would like
to see javascript implemented, I can do most of what I want to do. Links2
gets some of the javascript but it chokes in plenty of places for
various reasons also. If you
don't find lynx useful for your needs, I have no problem with that; you
can use whatever you like. People should use whatever
they find useful for their needs. As for me, I will continue to use lynx
and links2 and sometimes edbrowse and elinks and whatever else is out
there, and as accessibility becomes better
probably Mozilla, though I'd rather work in console. all of these are
tools for me for different tasks; it isn't a matter of "proving" what's
best for everybody. I'm not going to tell a newbie I work with NOT to use
lynx because it's useless, and especially not a blind person; I'm going to
present all the tools that are available and explain the strengths and
weaknesses as I have experienced them and let the person develop his/her
own preferences.
--
Cheryl
"Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also."
Reply to: