On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:36:27AM -0400 or thereabouts, Nick Smith wrote: > forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative? i do respect the hand > coding people out there, i too started coding with VI, but there is no way im > going to design complex image maps or anything else with lengthy code by hand > any more, too much chance for error and it takes way too long to do it. i > wish wine would pick up the pace and get compatible with MX 2004 and for that > matter photoshop CS. but i would be happy with just a dreamweaver alternative. > which in my search i can find nothing that comes close to the power of > dreamweaver. ps, im not knocking frontpage, i too have used it, but every > page i have created or seen created with it just doesnt look as professional > as compaired to what you can do with dreamweaver. most people go with front > page because dreamweaver has a much higher learning curve, but once you master > it you can do wonders. Drifting away from Linux Visual Editors... FrontPage 2003 is vastly superior to anything prior, in the FPage line. I'm definitely not a MSFT lover, but FP is closing the gap fast to DWMX. If I was doing any .NET web applications, I'd be using FrontPage 2003 before DWMX. A comparison chart of the major PC/Mac Visual Web Page Editors, can be found here; <http://mvp.wiserways.com/2003/compare.htm> -- Steve +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tuesday Jun 08 2004 10:01:01 PM EDT +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Azh nazg durbatal^uk, azh nazg gimbatul, Azh nazg thrakatal^uk agh burzum ishi krimpatul! -- J. R. R. Tolkien
Attachment:
pgpqTMYe3FPyT.pgp
Description: PGP signature