Re: what happened to KDE?
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:39:43 -0400
> From: Chris Metzler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: what happened to KDE?
> On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:26:58 UTC
> Tom Kuiper <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:19:06 -0400
> >> From: Chris Metzler <email@example.com>
> >> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >> Subject: Re: what happened to KDE?
> >> Hi. First of all, there's no need to CC me with any of this stuff.
> >> I read the list, obviously.
> > The way 'elm' parses the header, if I reply only to you, no copy goes to
> > the list. So, I do a 'group reply' to pick up what is on the Cc: line.
> OK, elm is broken. Nevertheless, PLEASE DO NOT CONTINUE TO CC ME.
> Sending to only the list is fine. I read the list. It's generally
> considered rude here to cc people with a second copy unless they
> request them. It's especially rude to continue to do it after
> they've asked you to stop, and even more so if the recipient is
> someone who's taking time to try to be helpful.
I accept your criticism and have found a work-around using 'forward'.
> With that out of the way . . .
> Given that you snipped the rest of the message I sent, I'm a little
> worried that you thought I'd top-posted, and thought that what you
> quoted was all I added. There was a bunch of stuff further below,
> indicating what I think is up with your gdm installation and what I
> think is up with KDE. You may have seen it and trimmed it; but due
> to paranoia, I'm just making sure you caught it.
You are right on the mark there, so I'll go back and repond to that