on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Joerg Johannes (liste_joerg@gmx.de) wrote:
> Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Derrick 'dman' Hudson um 15:46:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> >
> > | > Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid.
> > |
> > | OK, sorry for that. But now to something else: I use evolution as mua,
> > | and I don't quite understand what to do with inline PGP signatures.
> >
> > Upgrade them to PGP/MIME.
> >
> > This configuration is for maildrop, translation to procmail (if
> > desired) is an exercise for the reader :
>
> < snipped maildrop config >
>
> Thanks, Derrick. But the good thing about using evolution is, NOT having
> to use maildrop/procmail/fetchmail and all that stuff.
Typical broken GNOME thinking that modular software design is a Bad
Thing.
One of many places where GNOME is wrong.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Windows Refund Day II: fight for your right to refund
http://www.windowsrefund.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature