[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel



Kent West wrote:
Robert Packer wrote:

I am a complete newbie to this and don't have a clue how to compile a
kernel(I'm reading up, but still...), so is it possible to make the
2.4 kernel work with a nic card that needs a tulip driver? It works
fine with the 2.2.20 kernel but if possible I'd like to use the latest
kernel. Or is it the wiser thing to use the old kernel and then later
try to upgrade to the new kernel?

If someone could explain in big dummy terms how to do this it would
be
great. :P

Robert


Compiling a kernel is a great thing to do if you want the education, or if you have some esoteric need to do so, but for 90%+ of the population out there, the standard Debian kernels will do just fine.

That should be the case here; support for the tulip driver is built-into the standard 2.4 kernels.

So, just "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.24-686" (or whatever kernel version you want -- "apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4" will show you a list of available versions). After the reboot into the new kernel, you may find that the tulip driver has already loaded automagically; if not, just run "modconf" and select the "tulip" driver.

Hmm ... I just did that for the sheer joy of it. The last kernel I rolled was done according to this site:

http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html

so I went ahead and did:
#apt-get install kernel-image-2.6-386

after editing /etc/lilo.conf to include the line
initrd=/initrd.img

the install went ahead. A symlink to initrd.img was not found (as I recollect) so the install went ahead and created one. (Must say that I cannot find an initrd.img anywhere on the system) /sbin/lilo-v followed, and a reboot.

Reboot resulted in kernel panic. So here I am with the old kernel and a functioning LILO

What have I missed ... well, OK I am missing an initrd.img .... what should I do to fix that?

Brian



Reply to: