[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fetchmail Query



On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:54:24 +0100
Oliver Fuchs <oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de> wrote:


> 
> Hi,
> 
> this error message comes from your MTA side e.g. in my case sendmail. In
> cf.README you find:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Notice: domains which are temporarily unresolvable are (temporarily)
> rejected with a 451 reply code.  If those domains should be accepted
> (which is discouraged) then you can use
> 
> 	LOCAL_CONFIG
> 	C{ResOk}TEMP
> 
> sendmail will also refuse mail if the MAIL FROM: parameter is not
> fully qualified (i.e., contains a domain as well as a user).  If you
> want to continue to accept such senders, use
> 
> 	FEATURE(`accept_unqualified_senders')
> 
> [...]

Hmm, thanks Oliver, this is more than likely where I need to be heading I think. Obviously, I did the Google search, but not the mandatory man stuff  :-)

Do you think it's safe to enable this feature? In relation to this particular email I know it will be rejected by mimedefang anyway, so I guess it's the only real way to get the message out of my ISP's mailbox and rejected by mimedefang.

> 
> In man fetchmail you find:
> 
> [...]
> 
> RETRIEVAL FAILURE MODES
>        The protocols fetchmail uses to talk to mailservers are next to bulletproof.  In normal operation forwarding
>        to  port 25, no message is ever deleted (or even marked for deletion) on the host until the SMTP listener on
>        the client side has acknowledged to fetchmail that the message has been	either	accepted  for  delivery  or
>        rejected due to a spam block.
> 
> [...]
> 
> To avoid fetchnmail from keeping this spam in your ISP's email account
> add this feature to your sendmail.mc and recreate it.
> 
> Oliver

All makes sense to me now. Thanks for that. I need to learn some more about all these services I'm using, then I mightn't need to ask stupid questions in future  :-)

Pete



Reply to: