Re: fsck needed with ext3?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:02:07PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
> For some reason I had thought that fsck wasn't needed if I was running
> ext3. I installed Woody using ext3 for my main partition, but still,
> every 32nd boot, the system runs fsck.
That's normal.
> Is there some setting I'm missing that tells it that I'm running ext3
> and don't need fsck?
ext3 just means you don't necissarily need to fsck after a crash. It
doesn't mean that ext3 never needs a fsck. (It kind of goes for
people, too...if you've got an S/O, just try going 32 reboots without
a good fsck...I bet you go insane! 8;o)
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAMpE8UzgNqloQMwcRAi/WAKDWYBAqQWh2AZLRSih7wk1s8IbF6gCfdcmM
kgD69cRXNn7ndY/DI+aQTOs=
=ya4f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: