Re: elinks -dump without tables
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> links is an awful botch. Designwise, it's to browsers what MS-DOS is to
> OS's.
>
> > I don't much care for lynx output either. Is there a good way to get
> > table-oriented html pages into a text editor properly?
>
> w3m(1). It even has some Emacs integration.
>
The only text-mode browser I used to know was lynx. Then I discovered
links. Then I thought I read that links was frozen, and new development
was going on in elinks. So now I'm using elinks. But I thought I read
here the other day that *now* links is the one being developped and
elinks is the problem. Now there's w3m.
Can someone rank order why'd I'd prefer one of these?
Do I need more than one on my system?
Me = confused
Reply to: