Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
From: Roberto Sanchez <rcsanchez97@yahoo.es>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:53:53 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 401313A1.20609@yahoo.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 401305F6.9000900@hanaden.com>
References: <[🔎] 200401242319.03516.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <[🔎] 40130067.2080302@yahoo.es> <[🔎] 401305F6.9000900@hanaden.com>

hanasaki wrote:

I have had zero success with the 3D. I was using straight sarge withits xfree4.2 and 2D acceleration. Downloaded the ATI stuff and still noluck. Same situation with my current setup, below:
    debian sarge
    kernel 2.6.1
    xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned)

The x4.3 does a very nice job finding the card, agp and drm.


What chipset do you have?

-Roberto

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
  - From: hanasaki <hanasaki@hanaden.com>

References:
- ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
  - From: Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
- Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
  - From: Roberto Sanchez <rcsanchez97@yahoo.es>
- Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
  - From: hanasaki <hanasaki@hanaden.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Derivative effects.
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Bruce Perens talks to BBC
Previous by thread: Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
Next by thread: Re: ATI radeon 9200, 2.6 kernel, xfree 4.3 - but still bad performance (dri failing?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread