Re: mutt and Return-path
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:29:01PM +0100, M. Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:40:02PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> > Basically, it tells the addressee ``Don't reply to the address in the
> > `From:' field, but to this one/these, please.''
> >
> > See [1]RFC 822, section 4.4.3 for details.
> >
> > [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc822
> >
> > Is this what you asked for?
>
> Indeed. Currently I am setting From and Return-path to the same values
> in the default values and the folder-hook values
>
> Is Return-path necessary? It seems redundant. Your description doesn't
> imply that it's necessary. I'll read the RFC. Thanks.
I wouldn't have thought that the MUA should set Return-Path at all; it's
not its job. A brief glance at the mutt source shows no code that seems
to set Return-Path. Just leave it out of your .muttrc altogether?
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: