Re: mutt and Return-path
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:40:02PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:41:30AM -0500, Mike Mueller wrote:
> > Is there significance to the Return-path value?
>
> Basically, it tells the addressee ``Don't reply to the address in the
> `From:' field, but to this one/these, please.''
>
> See [1]RFC 822, section 4.4.3 for details.
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc822
>
> Is this what you asked for?
Indeed. Currently I am setting From and Return-path to the same values
in the default values and the folder-hook values
Is Return-path necessary? It seems redundant. Your description doesn't
imply that it's necessary. I'll read the RFC. Thanks.
Mike
Reply to: