Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:28:16 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ektyw3xr.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040117201931.GA256@droitwichbox.dyndns.org> (jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk's message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2004 20:19:31 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20040117163757.GE1022@droitwichbox.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20040117201931.GA256@droitwichbox.dyndns.org>

Pigeon writes:
> Should I file a wishlist bug asking for the mutt docs to explain what
> "outlook compatible" actually entails?

Of course.  Include a patch.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
  - From: Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>

References:
- Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
  - From: Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>
- Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
  - From: Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Documentation and Usability
Next by Date: Postgres
Previous by thread: Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
Next by thread: Re: Inline PGP signatures and headers created by mutt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread