Re: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks
From: Lajos Mester <l.mester@coming-it.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:19:01 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200401151019.01846.l.mester@coming-it.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040115040148.GA3277@quillandmouse.com>
References: <[🔎] 5706A0B8D49EB5438DDB623E59FF14FD2ADA@mail01.ccia.local> <[🔎] 20040115040148.GA3277@quillandmouse.com>

how about
</thread> ??

no flame, no war. Just Debian, please.

Reply to:

References:
- RE: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks
  - From: "Matthew Joyce" <MJoyce@ccia.org.au>
- RE: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks
  - From: Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com>

Prev by Date: breaking depenancies
Next by Date: Differences in RH Fedora coming from Debian
Previous by thread: RE: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks
Next by thread: Re: OT: Why stonehenge Sucks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread