[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cfdisk vs fdisk & speaking of Western Digital drives...



On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:49:16AM +0100, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:52:06PM -0500, Andy Firman wrote:
> > 
> > Hello.  I am not a hard drive expert and need some help in 
> > understanding a few things.
> > 
> > First, what is the difference between fdisk and cfdisk,
> > other cfdisk being curses based?
> > 
> 
> I read somewhere that 'cfdisk' should be better in defining partition
> borders fitting to those virtual cylinders and sectors of IDE drives.
> 
> With my 8 years old computer, I found following the Win95 FDISK by
> cfdisk in order to partition the rest of my drives for Linux to be less
> error-prone than working with fdisk.
...

My own experience with M$ systems stems from keeping Wintendo 98 on the
drive for Freespace.  Couldn't get that OS to not croak or attempt to
change the partition size--until I discovered it couldn't handle an
"oddly-sized" partition coming out of cfdisk (eg. 4224.5 Gb -- perhaps
anything not fitting a perfect marriage between block size and total
space?).

Anyway, my thought is to make sure you pick a nice whole number of Gb
(a nice binary multiple or multiples added together).  M$ may cry
otherwise.


Kenward
-- 
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be 
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, 
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next 
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone 
could have.     - Lee Iacocca



Reply to: