Re: [OT[UnOfficial Unsubscribe FAQ
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:53:16PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:09:42 -0600, Kent West wrote:
>
> > Several words have been used in this thread (it happens in other threads
> > also) that have traditionally been considered "foul language", at least
> > in my Texan culture, although without a standard definition of "foul
> > language" it's hard to claim with any absolute certainty that "this"
> > word is foul and "that" word is not. Still, my momma would've whooped me
> > good for using some of that language, and the FCC would have come down
> > hard on any broadcaster using such language 10 or 15 years ago, although
> > lately it seems to let almost anything on the airwaves. My general
> > thought is that if most people would not say it in church or in front of
> > a pastor/preacher/priest/rabbi/mom, it's foul language.
>
> That's a pretty good definition.
>
Except for the case of those words that many (would have,have) said to
those (Boston,other areas) priests.
Reply to: