Re: Warning mounting ext3 as ext2

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:12:30 +0100, 
David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il> wrote in message 
<[🔎] 200401021012.31542.d_baron@012.net.il>:

> <<To get a list of filesystems supported by your kernel, from the
> command line type;
> cat /proc/filesystems
> 
> So here it the output of this:
> nodev   rootfs
> nodev   bdev
> nodev   proc
> nodev   sockfs
> nodev   tmpfs
> nodev   shm
> nodev   pipefs
>         ext2
> nodev   ramfs
>         vfat
>         iso9660
> nodev   devpts
> nodev   usbdevfs
> nodev   usbfs
>         msdos
>         ntfs
>         ext3
> nodev   autofs#
> 
> Can I assume that ext3 is, as I suspected, supported here?
> 
> I notice there are several fsck flavors around includeing the fsck we
> run manually (hopefully I no longer need to use it) and an e2fsck
> which may be the one running on boot (and maybe giving that warning).
> There are also fsck.*****  files for each file system as well.
> 
> BTW, Knoppix is a Debian distribution.

..a Debian _derivative_ distro.  

> Knoppix provides a CD image and autoconfigures a KDE desktop. I
> apologize for any duplicated off-list mailings. I am not clear as to
> what should be on-list and what is better off-list.

..if it concerns Debian, _always_ on-list.

..those who wanna be cc'ed, will advice explicitly so, and set their
Reply-To: accordingly. 

..if it concerns whale and fish starvation, ozone layer depletion, or
Sissy Boy George's re-election, _always_off_this_list_.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.