On Mon, 01 Sep 2003, Michael Heironimus wrote: > X usually doesn't need much CPU power, as long as you have a reasonably > well-supported video card. Your problem is that you're running GNOME and > KDE, which are huge, bloated, and slow (and I'm being kind in saying > that). They have been for a long time, since before their first 1.0 > releases, and new versions seem to have been bloating even faster than > new releases of Windows have been. I'm probably repeating yet-another-X-fallacy (such as the infamous `X is slow because it uses client/server architecture): Under the pre-2.6 vanilla Linux kernels, multitasking was orientated more towards servers - perhaps one process would be a little slow, but things would keep chugging along. With the low latency patches to 2.4 and the new code in 2.6, desktop machines are supposed to be more responsive, making X seem quicker. Again, please take the above with a grain of salt - I've heard it repeated several times, but I have never seen benchmarks to prove that latency is an issue. ~ Jesse Meyer [ Happily using fluxbox and liking X windows - working fine for me with 1 server and client programs on 2 machines. ] -- Nifty linux app: bitlbee : use your favorite IRC client to interface with aim, icq, msn messenger and yim (www.lintux.cx/bitlbee.html) ==== icq: 34583382 msn: dasunt@hotmail.com yim: tsunad ====
Attachment:
pgpVp9_fOFDBw.pgp
Description: PGP signature