Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls

To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 03:31:43 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030801103143.GC8002@ursine.ca>
Mail-followup-to: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3F2A1515.9070005@tacocat.net>
References: <96F38967F729284A8B6A2CE70CF09A09150871@datcom-exchange.datcom_ho.local> <20030731205021.73a93433.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> <20030731133043.GA3169@soul> <1059661343.7505.483.camel@haggis> <[🔎] 3F2A1515.9070005@tacocat.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:21:57AM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> This is assuming you are under 256 users on a subnet.

Why would it be a problem with more?

- -- 
 .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :'  :    proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/KkGPJ5vLSqVpK2kRAovlAKDPZeWPaOs/5TGO3aMjmR4OVB2S5QCeK/te
o90svTFia9C8L+2jUKFBRec=
=FEz0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
  - From: Tom Allison <tallison@tacocat.net>

References:
- Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
  - From: Tom Allison <tallison@tacocat.net>

Prev by Date: Film Editting
Next by Date: Re: Look at these update from M$ Corporation.
Previous by thread: Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
Next by thread: Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread