[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pinning question

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:48:39 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:47:21AM -0500, Rich B wrote:
>> What did I do wrong? I thought my Pin-prioritys would prevent anything 
>> from upgrading to Sid unless I explicitly asked for it.
> Don't pin between stable and anything newer, or you'll end up just
> having some serious cascading dependencies that will result in you
> running testing or unstable in the end anyway.  See also: apt-pinning
> considered harmful unless you *really* know what it's going to do.
> Use http://www.apt-get.org/ to find good backports for woody instead.

I thought pinning seemed dicey when I first read up on it.

Whenever I think of the word "pinning", I have this persistent visual of
how entymologists store insects.


"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected."
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972)

Reply to: