[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody



Monique Y. Herman wrote:

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 at 23:33 GMT, Paul Morgan penned:
In my experience, /opt and /usr/local have slightly different
functions.  /opt would be used for vendor applications, etc., whereas
/usr/local would be used for locally built tools, etc.


That seems like a really arbitrary way to choose to split up
executables.  I guess I just don't understand why I as an admin would
care to make that distinction.

A real life example:

If you're administering a couple of hundred servers on a corporate network, then it makes sense. The key is standardization. The apps that the different servers run you put in /opt (for instance, one server may be running an Oracle-based application, another an Informix application, so you put Oracle orInformix and the app in /opt).

/usr/local can be the same on all the servers.

This is current normal practice with Unices, and, much to its credit, is the way the FHS is also defined.

--
....................paul


To any other Nation the loss of a Nelson would have been irreparable,
but in the British Fleet off Cadiz, every Captain was a Nelson.

-- Adm Pierre Charles de Villeneuve,
after the death of Adm Horatio Nelson
at the Battle of Trafalgar, October 21, 1805.





Reply to: