[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Experiment: Neophyte versus Windows XP & Debian Woody



Edward Murrell wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 12:23, Roberto Sanchez wrote:

I haven't come across packages that install into /opt. For source
packages, I use ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/stow/packagename
and have "stow" handle the symlinking to /usr/local/bin, etc.



The OpenOffice.org binary tarball defaults to /opt (at least it did
in version 1.0)


I've never understood the need for /opt/. Or more precisely, I've never
understood the need for /opt/ when you have /usr/local/, and in my
travels have yet to find any solid reasoning beyond what seems to be
that the first person to create /opt/ didn't know about /usr/local/.

(I'm almost certainly wrong of course, but I still haven't been able to
find anything that tells me so with any decent authority.)

http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/

/opt : Add-on application software packages
/usr/local : Local hierarchy

the way I understand it: if I install some non-debian package (from tarball etc.) it should go into /opt/package-version (or something like that)

the /usr/local is for my own (=admin) stuff, no software that I download someplace else should touch it (unless I ask it to).

I usually install extra software in /opt/package-version and use stow to create links in /usr/local, but I guess installing it somewhere under /usr/local works as well (I just don't think packages should default to that).

	erik



Reply to: