[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aspell with mutt



On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500
Stephen <dallan@rogers.com> wrote:

> Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before?
> 
> I happen to like Aspell much better, so hopefully you can clarify
> what's the issue with the Aspell license.

I'm afraid I'm not a wealth of knowledge here, but I noticed it in the
list of "Removed Packages" in the recent release announcement of Debian
3.0r2 on the Debian-announce list. 

Looking at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/ I notice it is actually
on the Accepted list, though they have this note with it:
"The license incorrectly says that it's LGPL but it is in fact a unique
license which is non-DFSG-free."

Perhaps Mr. Schulze (joey@debian.org) would have more information about
this, since he appears to be the author of that page.

HTH,
Jacob

----- 
GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135

Linux. Where do you want to go tomorrow? 

Attachment: pgpOA0FEdajCG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: