On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:39:28 -0500 Stephen <email@example.com> wrote: > Well that's too bad, why now, has the license changed from before? > > I happen to like Aspell much better, so hopefully you can clarify > what's the issue with the Aspell license. I'm afraid I'm not a wealth of knowledge here, but I noticed it in the list of "Removed Packages" in the recent release announcement of Debian 3.0r2 on the Debian-announce list. Looking at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/ I notice it is actually on the Accepted list, though they have this note with it: "The license incorrectly says that it's LGPL but it is in fact a unique license which is non-DFSG-free." Perhaps Mr. Schulze (firstname.lastname@example.org) would have more information about this, since he appears to be the author of that page. HTH, Jacob ----- GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Linux. Where do you want to go tomorrow?
Description: PGP signature