[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Help! strange bttv problem



Hi

well, I don't know about xconfig but config/menuconfig leave all options
in the config file and just comment out the option that are not
set...sot that you should at least see them....#
When I tried it quickly qith a 2.4.21 source that is lying around on my
disc it also sets the CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848 option if I activate it at
multimedia devices

yours
Albert

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:20:08 +0000
Richard Kimber <rkimber@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:18:57 +0100
> Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > bttv works well for most things with 2.4.22
> > (at the moment im using bttv 9.11 (development version) from
> > bytesex.org/bttv/ with 2.4.22 to test v4l2 support but otherwise it
> > works well with the included version for me
> > 
> > ...
> > #
> > # Multimedia devices
> > #
> > CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV=m
> > 
> > #
> > # Video For Linux
> > #
> > CONFIG_VIDEO_PROC_FS=y
> > CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT=m
> > 
> > #
> > # Video Adapters
> > #
> > CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848=m
> > ...
> > +i2c support
> > 
> > yours
> > Albert Dengg
> > 
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:18:56 +0000
> > Richard Kimber <rkimber@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > When I do make xconfig for the first time in a clean 2.4.22 tree I
> > > am presented with the option to have support for BT848 video for
> > > linux(having already said 'm' to the main Video for Linux and to
> > > I2C support). When I choose 'm' and save, an examination of
> > > .config shows there is no reference to it.
> 
> Are you saying that this is just a problem with xconfig, and that I
> should edit .config by hand? Or is the problem more fundamental?
> 
> - Richard
> -- 
> Richard Kimber
> http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org


-- 
Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>

Attachment: pgpDb6IMXvrrx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: