Re: apt-get question

To: debian user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: apt-get question
From: Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:08:50 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031105030850.GF28515@rei.moonkingdom.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031104214002.GB11348@isite.net>
References: <[🔎] 1067915692.431.1.camel@defiant> <[🔎] 20031104072615.GA11231@ooder.ertius.org> <[🔎] 20031104214002.GB11348@isite.net>

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:40:02PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
> You've got to be kidding me.  Hm, let's base the stability of our system on
> whether or not someone bothered to report a bug?  With no way to go back?
> Right...

You mean let's NOT, as potentially useful input, evaluate whether or not
anyone ELSE might have had a problem before allowing something from
unstable to update?

Yeah, right...

-- 
 Marc Wilson |     Spirtle, n.: The fine stream from a grapefruit
 msw@cox.net |     that always lands right in your eye.  -- Sniglets,
             |     "Rich Hall & Friends"

Reply to:

References:
- apt-get question
  - From: Robert Soricone <rbs2@dana.ucc.nau.edu>
- Re: apt-get question
  - From: Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org>
- Re: apt-get question
  - From: Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net>

Prev by Date: Re: setting hardware clock from NIST
Next by Date: Re: X that supports rotation?
Previous by thread: Re: apt-get question
Next by thread: Re: apt-get question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread