[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Multiple 'To' in mutt

Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:15:19AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote:
> I'm trying to shift to mutt full time, and I'm amazed at how little it 
> sucks (!).

I believe mutt gets both RMS's and ESR's seal of approvals, and they
both have so much as said that they dedicate their efforts to
"software that which does not suck."

> I do have one question though, how do I add people to the 
> 'To', 'Cc' and 'Bcc' fields from my address book?

Since you don't get to see who is in the BCC field, count that one out.

> Also, on a side note, I'm using a local IMAP server for a local account
> using Maildir, and I was wondering if mutt is strict with Maildir?

Why do it this way to begin with, when mutt is easier to deal with
working against local spools?

- -- 
 .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :'  :    
`. `'`     proud Debian admin and user
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: