[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems installing g++



Well,

The problem was urgent and I need the compiler. 
So ... reinstall Debian was the only solution. 

Now that I am reintalling my CDRW, I have difficulties.
I have compiler the kernel with the right options as said in
CDRW-how-to (and this did work in the previous system) but 
I have this complain:

/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
unregister_cdrom_Rsmp_703d3575
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
cdrom_release_Rsmp_b388b28c
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
cdrom_number_of_slots_Rsmp_5d8f3672
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
register_cdrom_Rsmp_5a61744f
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
cdrom_media_changed_Rsmp_0054e9fe
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
cdrom_ioctl_Rsmp_bb7265aa
/lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o: unresolved symbol
cdrom_open_Rsmp_837500f7


Any help? Thank you
Arian




Sebastian Kapfer <sebastian_kapfer@web.de> wrote in message news:<xizo.6aE.11@gated-at.bofh.it>...
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:40:12 +0200, A. Novruzi wrote:
> 
> > Now, I try to install g++. The system complains different problems
> > like the package x requires package y, while y requires x. So it does
> > not install g++.
> 
> Please show the exact message. Probably it's just some old package which
> apt-get doesn't dare to remove. Once you remove it manually, the
> installation should work.
> 
> > My previous g++ worked perfeclty but what I have now, gcc, it does not
> > know any *.h classes.
> 
> What's a *.h class? Do you mean header files?
> 
> > Do I have to make a new install of my Debian or somthing better is possible.
> 
> No, I'm 99% sure that you don't have to reinstall.
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,   |   Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
>  Sebastian      |   your ~/.signature to help me spread!



Reply to: