RE: failed upgrade to unstable... libxrender1
James Strandboge wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 16:28, Michael Kahle wrote:
>>>Did you have the gnome2.2 woody backport installed?
>> Yes I did. I was runny woody. I then installed the backport at a
>> later date. I the decided to switch to testing.
>Glad dselect helped. It is not recommended to go from the backport
>to testing, but instead the backport to sid. The reason being is
>that much of the backport is much farther ahead of testing.
>I did correct a dependency issue with libxrender1.1 (which is from
>the backport) and libxrender1. You won't be able to install
>libxrender1 now without removing libxrender1.1. This should help
>people attempting what you did.
I apologize. I went from stable to unstable (sid). I hope that my
slip did not prompt the propagation of a change that was unnecessary
or worse wrong!