[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ..chroot-installs onto RAID-1 disks ,was: Evolving Debian from Red Hat



On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:40:40 +0100, 
"Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message 
<[🔎] 20030914024040.GA18694@guildenstern.dyndns.org>:

> on Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:36:34AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen (arnt@c2i.net)
> wrote:> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:31:38 -0400, 
> > Greg Folkert <greg@gregfolkert.net> wrote in message 
> > <[🔎] 1063416698.27592.5.camel@duke.gregfolkert.net>:
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 18:31, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > ..has anyone tried use these methods to intall to boxes with
> > > > RAID-1 etc disks?:
> > 
> > ..note to self; heed ESR's advice on asking smart; I ofcourse meant
> > software RAID but never said so.
> 
> I assume that's yourself, and not yours truly ;-)

..my what?  ;-)

> As I frequently say, the advantage of a chroot install is that it
> allows you to tackle one problem rather than two.  So while I haven't
> tackled your specific problem, I think you'll find it's not a
> show-stopper.

..well, in my case, comparing it to the 15 minute RH installs, 
this is too damn close, I am missing some basic clue whack.

..I want the boot loader in the MBR's of /dev/hd[a|c], so in 
/etc/lilo.conf and in /boot/grub/grub.conf, I put _what_ in 
the "boot=/dev/$whatever"???  I use "root=/dev/md0", and this 
works _beautifully_ with RH-7.3 on the very same damn box.

> That is:  with a standard installation, you're conerned with booting
> and getting full support of the hardware you're installing onto, _and_
> loading a new distribution onto it.
> 
> With a chroot install, you've already solved the hardware problem,
> whether by installing under an iexisting system, or by using a
> gneeral-purpose boot disk specializing in supporting a wide range of
> systems.
> 
> The key with a chroot install is to identify your support requirements
> and ensure that you have them covered.  In your case, that would mean
> installing a kernel with compiled-in SW RAID support, or ensuring your
> initrd loads the appropriate modules for this.

..done: gw:~# uname -a ; lsmod | grep -v ipt
Linux gw 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
Module                  Size  Used by    Not tainted
i2c-proc                6272   0  (unused)
i2c-algo-pcf            4800   0  (unused)
i2c-algo-bit            6924   0  (unused)
i2c-core               12160   0  [i2c-proc i2c-algo-pcf i2c-algo-bit]
raid0                   3104   0  (unused)
raid1                  11876   0  (unused)
md                     43488   7  [raid0 raid1]
keybdev                 1664   0  (unused)
usbkbd                  2848   0  (unused)
input                   3072   0  [keybdev usbkbd]
usb-uhci               20708   0  (unused)
usbcore                48032   0  [usbkbd usb-uhci]

..and, yeah, I know I need to add these as "--failed-disk"'s.:
gw:~# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda9             486M   32M  429M   7% /
/dev/hda1              45M  5.9M   37M  14% /boot
/dev/hda3              30G   70M   28G   1% /var
/dev/hda6             1.4G   33M  1.3G   3% /home
/dev/hda5             478M  8.1M  445M   2% /tmp
/dev/hda8             1.9G  200M  1.5G  11% /usr
gw:~#

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



Reply to: