Re: testing/unstable reccomendation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 September 2003 09:14 am, Joey Harrison wrote:
> I understand there are no security updates for
> testing/unstable, because they are so fluid, but what
> exactly is the difference between them and, between
> the two, which is more reliable and better for someone
> who wants bleeding-edge packages that have at least a
> safe level of critical bugs?
>
> =====
> --Joey--
If 'bleeding-edge is what you want then unstable is the version to
use, i.e Testing has the same vesion of Evolution that Woody has, no
Abiword, etc...
- --
Greg Madden
Debian GNU/Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/XMBWk7rtxKWZzGsRAtbLAJ4oL6hjUouVo1hCwIknfbPHu76X9QCgxauo
w04TKtO56hmxaZXlYMEzYJE=
=WaIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: